The EU’s AMLR: A Defining Moment for Cryptocurrency Regulation

Core Provisions of the AMLR

Published in the EU’s Official Journal on 19 June 2024, the AMLR forms part of a comprehensive anti-money laundering framework, encompassing Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (the AMLR), Directive (EU) 2024/1640 (AMLD6), and Regulation (EU) 2024/1620, which establishes the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA) in Frankfurt, effective from 1 July 2025. The AMLR imposes uniform obligations across member states, ensuring consistent enforcement. Its cryptocurrency-specific measures are stringent: crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) and financial institutions are prohibited from supporting anonymous accounts or privacy coins, which utilise cryptographic methods to conceal transaction details. Transactions above €1,000 require full Know Your Customer (KYC) verification, aligning digital assets with traditional banking standards. Furthermore, the regulation bans cash payments exceeding €10,000 and mandates identity checks for cash transactions between €3,000 and €10,000.

The AMLA will oversee up to 40 high-risk CASPs with significant cross-border operations, defined as those with over 20,000 customers or €50 million in annual transaction volume. This complements the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), effective since June 2024, which mandated licensing for CASPs. The AMLR’s scope extends to traditional financial instruments, including bank accounts and safe-deposit boxes, reflecting a unified approach to financial transparency. Non-compliance carries substantial penalties, such as fines and operational restrictions, highlighting the regulation’s enforcement focus.

Wider Implications for the Cryptocurrency Sector

The AMLR’s measures will profoundly impact the cryptocurrency ecosystem. For users, the elimination of anonymous accounts and privacy coins may undermine confidence, particularly among those relying on financial privacy for legitimate purposes, such as protecting assets in jurisdictions with political or economic instability. Privacy coins face delisting from EU-regulated exchanges, as demonstrated by Coinbase’s removal of Tether’s USDT in December 2024 under MiCA compliance. Market data underscores this pressure: Monero’s price declined 7.2% to $119.20, and Zcash fell 5.8% to $21.76 within hours of the May 2025 announcement, reflecting concerns over reduced liquidity.

CASPs must implement significant compliance upgrades to meet KYC and reporting requirements, likely increasing operational costs and potentially marginalising smaller firms. The €1,000 KYC threshold, while consistent with anti-money laundering objectives, may burden retail traders, particularly in the UK, where post-Brexit regulatory divergence could complicate compliance for firms operating across both markets. The regulation exposes a paradox: public blockchains offer inherent transparency, with transactions visible to all, unlike private bank accounts, yet the AMLR imposes stricter oversight, framing cryptocurrency as uniquely susceptible to illicit activity. This approach aligns with global regulatory trends, such as the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s 2022 actions against over 8,500 misleading financial promotions, but risks overreach by associating privacy with criminality.

Perspectives from Online Discourse

Reactions to the AMLR reveal a spectrum of views. Some commentators support the regulation, arguing it strengthens financial integrity. Official EU statements emphasise AMLA’s role in enhancing cross-border coordination, a perspective echoed in online discussions that view the AMLR as a logical extension of MiCA, fostering a secure digital economy. Such arguments highlight the need to address money laundering and terrorist financing, which regulators associate with anonymous transactions.

Conversely, one view posits that the AMLR represents an overreach, undermining civil liberties and innovation. Critics contend that the regulation’s broad prohibition on privacy coins ignores their legitimate applications, such as shielding individuals in authoritarian regimes. Some analyses suggest the EU lacks robust evidence linking privacy coins to widespread illicit activity, arguing that the regulation’s focus on transparency disregards blockchain’s existing traceability. These perspectives warn that the AMLR could drive privacy-focussed projects to less-regulated jurisdictions, such as Singapore or the UAE, potentially fragmenting the global crypto market.

Towards a Balanced Regulatory Framework

The AMLR constitutes a robust effort to safeguard the financial system but raises concerns about proportionality. By prioritising transparency, it risks alienating users and stifling innovation in privacy-focussed technologies. Alternative approaches, such as cryptographic methods that verify transactions without exposing sensitive data, could reconcile compliance with privacy but are absent from the current framework. For UK businesses and traders, the regulation necessitates proactive measures, including compliance audits and enhanced KYC processes, particularly for those engaged in EU markets. Post-Brexit, alignment with EU standards remains essential for cross-border operations, despite potential divergence in UK Financial Conduct Authority policies.

With the 1 July 2027 deadline approaching, stakeholders must advocate for regulation that balances security with individual rights. The AMLR’s effectiveness will hinge on its ability to adapt, ensuring financial integrity while preserving the transformative potential of digital assets in a rapidly evolving global landscape.

If you need help with any regulatory matters, get in touch with us via the contact page and we can schedule a call to discuss how we may be able to assist.