Crypto ETNs and the UK’s Evolving Regulatory Landscape: A Path to Derivatives Reform

Understanding Crypto Exchange-Traded Notes

Crypto ETNs are financial instruments that allow investors to gain exposure to the price movements of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum without direct ownership. Issued by financial institutions such as Barclays or 21Shares, ETNs are unsecured debt securities listed on regulated exchanges, such as the London Stock Exchange. Their value tracks the performance of a specific crypto asset or index, minus management fees, which typically range from 0.5% to 2% annually. Unlike direct crypto ownership, ETNs eliminate the need for digital wallets or exposure to custodial risks. However, they introduce counterparty risk: if the issuer becomes insolvent, investors may lose their capital, regardless of the underlying crypto’s performance.

For UK retail investors, ETNs offer a regulated entry point into crypto markets through traditional brokerage accounts. The FCA’s decision this month to lift the 2021 ban on retail crypto ETN trading, subject to strict risk disclosures and exchange oversight, reflects a pragmatic approach to balancing innovation with investor protection. This move aligns with the broader regulatory framework outlined in the Draft Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Cryptoassets) Order 2025, which seeks to integrate cryptocurrencies into the UK’s financial system.

The FCA’s Softening Stance on Crypto

The FCA’s ETN proposal is, in our view, a clear signal of a softening stance on cryptocurrencies, driven by a desire to bolster the UK’s competitiveness in global financial markets. The regulator’s shift comes amid growing international acceptance of crypto products, such as spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States and retail crypto derivatives in Hong Kong. By allowing retail access to ETNs, the FCA acknowledges that cryptocurrencies are no longer a fringe asset class but a legitimate component of modern portfolios. This is a victory for digital asset advocates, who have long argued that overzealous regulation stifles innovation and drives capital to less regulated jurisdictions.

The ETN decision is not an isolated act. The FCA’s earlier move in 2025 to permit institutional investors to trade crypto derivatives on platforms like GFO-X, coupled with the launch of Bitcoin futures and options in May, seems to demonstrate a willingness to embrace regulated crypto markets for sophisticated players. These developments suggest a nuanced regulatory philosophy: the FCA is open to crypto’s potential but remains wary of retail investor risks. As lawyers, we applaud this progress, yet we cannot ignore the FCA’s stubborn refusal to extend similar freedoms to retail derivatives trading. The regulator’s insistence on maintaining the 2021 ban, citing volatility and market abuse, feels increasingly anachronistic in a maturing crypto ecosystem.

The Potential for Derivatives Reform

Could the ETN breakthrough herald a relaxation of the FCA’s ban on retail crypto derivatives? Derivatives, such as futures and options, allow investors to speculate on crypto price movements, often with leverage, amplifying both gains and losses. The FCA’s 2021 ban (PS20/10) was grounded in arguably legitimate concerns about retail investor losses, but it has left the UK trailing behind jurisdictions that permit regulated derivatives trading. As pro-crypto lawyers, we believe the ETN decision could lay the groundwork for reform, though significant hurdles remain.

The successful implementation of regulated ETN trading could demonstrate that retail investors are capable of navigating crypto markets with appropriate safeguards. If ETNs prove resilient to market shocks and retail investors show financial literacy, the FCA may gain confidence to reconsider its derivatives stance. Industry voices, such as CryptoUK’s Ian Taylor, are already advocating for such a shift, arguing that capped leverage and enhanced disclosures could mitigate risks. The global competitive landscape adds pressure: as jurisdictions like the US and Hong Kong expand retail crypto access, the UK risks becoming a regulatory laggard, haemorrhaging investment to more permissive markets.

Yet, the FCA’s caution is not without merit. Crypto derivatives are inherently complex, and leverage magnifies the potential for catastrophic losses. As lawyers, we must concede that investor protection is paramount, but we would contend that a blanket ban is a blunt instrument. A phased approach - permitting derivatives with strict leverage caps and mandatory risk warnings - could strike a balance. The FCA’s own actions, such as approving institutional derivatives, suggest it trusts regulated frameworks to manage risks. Why not extend this trust to retail investors under similar conditions?

A Call for Bold Reform

The FCA’s ETN proposal is a commendable step, but it is not enough. The UK has an opportunity to lead the global crypto revolution, yet the retail derivatives ban holds us back. We would urge the FCA to engage with industry stakeholders and explore regulated derivatives access for retail investors. Let us not shy away from bold reforms that embrace innovation while safeguarding consumers. The crypto genie is out of the bottle, and the UK must decide whether to harness its potential or be left behind. We invite regulators, investors, and policymakers to join this debate and shape a future where the UK is a crypto powerhouse.

Need regulatory advice or seeking FCA authorisation? Contact us today for a free, no obligation, preliminary consultation.